Flickr + Twitter is Live, What about Licensing/Legalities?

by Aaron on July 1, 2009

Flickr LogoYesterday Flickr released their Flickr2Twitter integration into the wild after a brief testing period (previous post). There are two uses for the new integration: the first is that Flickr users can now upload a photo to Flickr and have it tweeted by sending the photo to a special email address (functionality similar to Twitpic). The other use is that photos already on Flickr can be sent to Twitter; they’ll be posted along with a shortened-url link back to the original photo on Twitter.

On Twitter, @jkuramot wondered about the licensing and legal implications of the new service. For posting/tweeting one’s own photos, it’s not much of an issue, but it bears looking at the situation where any user could tweet a link to a photo taken by another user. After examining the implementation of the feature, I don’t think there are any issues at all. Since the posting to Twitter isn’t actually posting the photo (only a link), the photo isn’t being redistributed. Anyone who clicks the link will view the photo on its original Flickr page, which will include license information.

Flickr has implemented the Twitter feature under the “Blog This” button, so users can further restrict the ability using Flickr’s existing set of permissions that control the blog-ability of a photo.

For more information on how to use the new Flickr Twitter integration, see the help links in the announcement blog post.

These other posts might be of interest to you:

  1. Flickr + Twitter: the End of Twitpic?
  2. Social Photo Podcast #3: @dailyshoot Update, Flickr to Twitter, and Short Flickr URLs
  3. How to Let Others Share Your Flickr Photos via Blogs
  • http://theappslab.com/ Jake

    I guess I was just wondering if there would be any uneasiness about lack of attribution. Services like TwitPic don’t have that problem and have set the expectation that a picture is by the tweeter. Flickr’s integration allows tweeting other people’s work, so I just wanted your take on it.

  • http://theappslab.com Jake

    I guess I was just wondering if there would be any uneasiness about lack of attribution. Services like TwitPic don’t have that problem and have set the expectation that a picture is by the tweeter. Flickr’s integration allows tweeting other people’s work, so I just wanted your take on it.

  • http://www.brianmerwin.com/ Brian

    Jake – I don’t believe that there will be any issue with attribution here either simply considering that the links posted to Twitter using the new integration method are vanity URL’s that point directly back to the original flickr page – where the original photographer’s info is readily available (unless of course the image on the flickr page in question has been stolen – but that’s an entirely different can of worms so to speak).

  • http://www.brianmerwin.com Brian

    Jake – I don’t believe that there will be any issue with attribution here either simply considering that the links posted to Twitter using the new integration method are vanity URL’s that point directly back to the original flickr page – where the original photographer’s info is readily available (unless of course the image on the flickr page in question has been stolen – but that’s an entirely different can of worms so to speak).

Previous post:

Next post: