http://www.socialphototalk.com/flickr-twitter-is-live-what-about-licensinglegalities/ Social Media Marketing for Photographers // Photography + Community Mon, 26 Jul 2010 17:07:27 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://www.socialphototalk.com/flickr-twitter-is-live-what-about-licensinglegalities/comment-page-1/#comment-60 Brian Mon, 13 Jul 2009 02:58:53 +0000 http://www.socialphototalk.com/?p=152#comment-60 Jake - I don't believe that there will be any issue with attribution here either simply considering that the links posted to Twitter using the new integration method are vanity URL's that point directly back to the original flickr page - where the original photographer's info is readily available (unless of course the image on the flickr page in question has been stolen - but that's an entirely different can of worms so to speak). Jake – I don’t believe that there will be any issue with attribution here either simply considering that the links posted to Twitter using the new integration method are vanity URL’s that point directly back to the original flickr page – where the original photographer’s info is readily available (unless of course the image on the flickr page in question has been stolen – but that’s an entirely different can of worms so to speak).

]]> http://www.socialphototalk.com/flickr-twitter-is-live-what-about-licensinglegalities/comment-page-1/#comment-38 Jake Fri, 03 Jul 2009 00:18:50 +0000 http://www.socialphototalk.com/?p=152#comment-38 I guess I was just wondering if there would be any uneasiness about lack of attribution. Services like TwitPic don't have that problem and have set the expectation that a picture is by the tweeter. Flickr's integration allows tweeting other people's work, so I just wanted your take on it. I guess I was just wondering if there would be any uneasiness about lack of attribution. Services like TwitPic don’t have that problem and have set the expectation that a picture is by the tweeter. Flickr’s integration allows tweeting other people’s work, so I just wanted your take on it.

]]>