<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Expose Your Social</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.socialphototalk.com/expose-your-social/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.socialphototalk.com/expose-your-social/</link>
	<description>Social Media Marketing for Photographers // Photography + Community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:32:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.socialphototalk.com/expose-your-social/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 23:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialphototalk.com/?p=57#comment-14</guid>
		<description>If you usually watermark photos with a url, putting a Twitter ID works as well.  Personally I don&#039;t watermark so I hadn&#039;t considered using a Twitter name there...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you usually watermark photos with a url, putting a Twitter ID works as well.  Personally I don&#8217;t watermark so I hadn&#8217;t considered using a Twitter name there&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael D</title>
		<link>http://www.socialphototalk.com/expose-your-social/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 06:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialphototalk.com/?p=57#comment-13</guid>
		<description>How about your photos (let&#039;s say ones posted to flickr). Would you consider a twitter profile in bottom corner of image, vs traditional url credit? Better to leave those images clear when used in client blog posts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about your photos (let&#8217;s say ones posted to flickr). Would you consider a twitter profile in bottom corner of image, vs traditional url credit? Better to leave those images clear when used in client blog posts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
