Looks Like Antisocial Media to Me…

by Aaron on January 20, 2010

One of the cornerstones of my definition of what is social media is that social media features conversation – two-way interaction instead of traditional marketing which often consists of a one-way broadcast. There’s a certain type of social media user that really wants to keep things one-way… I refer to that as antisocial media. Here are some specific examples as photographers:

No more words

Blogs Without Comments

Comments are the usual method of enabling the “social” side of blogging, although there are a (small) number of bloggers that feel they don’t want feedback via comments. In the marketing world there’s Seth Godin, and in the photography world we have Scott Bourne at Photofocus. Even though these folks have some good ideas, they’re missing out on the opportunity to participate in a conversation. Yes, there are a variety of reasons why comments can occasionally become a burden (trolls, spam, etc) but modern blog systems contain anti-spam measures and the issue of how to deal with trolls is one which has been discussed to death.

Twitter Without Conversation

Yesterday I linked to an article talking about four styles of marketing on Twitter. Coincidentally, a couple days ago Nicole Young posted Ten Twitter Tips for Photographers. I disagree with her on this one:

4. Minimize your personal conversations. If all I see are random conversations between you and another person (or several for that matter) then it’s the same as being in an elevator listening to another person’s conversation when I have no idea what’s going on. Usually the “ignore” flag goes up and I move on. Replying to people is awesome, but when it goes on-and-on then your tweets are viewed as “diluted”. You want to try and maintain at least a 80/20 ratio … for every ten tweets you do try to keep about eight of them relevant to photography.

I’m in the opposite camp… if someone isn’t having conversations, I won’t follow them. I don’t want to hear someone only talking about themselves and ignoring feedback. Even if it looks like someone is having tons of conversations, you won’t see all of them. Twitter only shows @replies when you follow both parties in the conversation. If you’re following me, and send an @reply to someone that you’re not following, you won’t see that reply. The rest of Nicole’s tips are pretty good, but I think that discouraging conversation is the wrong way to go.

Are you using social media tools as mechanisms for conversation? Or are you perhaps being a bit antisocial in your usage?

Photo by Katie Tegtmeyer, used under Creative Commons licensing

These other posts might be of interest to you:

  1. Social Media is about Conversation
  2. If You’re Blogging Without Comments… Don’t
  3. The Basics: Introduction to Social Media for Photographers
  • I have to disagree with you on your Twitter advice. I consider @ posts in my Twitter stream to be nothing but noise. There is no content in them that applies to me, and they're obviously not talking to me. One of the criteria I use to follow someone is to see the proportion of information to noise. If a fourth or more of their posts are @ replies, I don't.

    Perhaps it's because I think of Twitter as mini-blogging. I use it to inform and to be informed. Not to converse. Facebook is much better suited for that, and that is where my significant online conversations occur.
  • Since you'll only see @reply conversations for those whom you follow, it's not as if you're seeing "noise" from random strangers. I like to think of my twitter stream as being much like a party with a lot of attendees. Occasionally I'll overhear something at the party (see an @reply conversation) between two people I know and I might choose to add my thoughts to their conversation.

    To each their own... but I don't see too much value in Twitter if it's only going to consist of short broadcast messages.
  • Hi ... you make a good point on the conversation thing. I completely agree that you should interact with other people on Twitter, but when ALL I see are drawn-out conversations, and no real content, then it dilutes the person's twitter feed (I guess I had a few specific people in mind when I wrote that, lol). I guess that's what I was trying to get across in my post. :)
  • Thanks for responding Nicole. I agree that one can't be all conversations, all of the time. I think everyone's tolerance level and preferences vary.. .glad to see that perhaps I interpreted your post incorrectly.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: